| Serum b12 Assay
| Falsely positive serum B12 tests (low levels in the absence of B12 deficiency) 
| Study shows assay to have only a 22.2% positive predictive value. After a five-year 
  follow up on low serum B12 levels nearly 4 of 5 individuals were without clinical 
  evidence of B12 deficiency.17,18 
 Of 504 patients with low serum B12, only 22% (109) had clinically important 
  deficiency.26
 
 Of 47 subjects with low serum B12 only 7 (15%) were shown to be clinically B12 
  deficient.17,18
 
 About 20-40% of elderly people with low serum vitamin B12 levels have completely 
  normal metabolic status 1,2 and cannot be regarded as B12 deficient.
 
 "Because low cobalamin concentrations can occur in the absence of deficiency, 
  the term 'cobalamin deficiency' should probably be reserved for those 
  cases with accompanying clinical or metabolic evidence supporting the diagnosis". 
  2
 
 For clarification, there is an inexact relationship between serum B12 and cellular 
  B12 since the total serum B12 is bound to three carriers proteins: transcobalamin-I 
  (TC-I),TC II and TC III. Only TC-II, which carries less than 20% of the serum 
  B12, delivers B12 to the tissues. Measurement of TC-II levels have not been 
  proven to be an accurate indicator of tissue B12 deficiency 6 and the assay 
  is not a functional test.
 |  |  
| Falsely negative serum B12 tests (normal levels in the presence of B12 deficiency) 
| Of 35 seniors with high uMMA, 49% had a normal serum B12 level.14 
 Subjects (14%) found B12 deficient showed equal numbers with serum B12 < 
  200 pg/ml (below normal) and between 200 and 300 pg/ml.27 Accordingly, MMA 
  testing was recommended for individuals with serum B12 levels < 350 pg/ml 
  .28 However, another study advised against serum MMA (SMMA) testing subjects 
  with low normal serum B12 since huge numbers of non B12 deficient individuals 
  would be caught in the net.2 This dilemma illustrates the need to use the accurate 
  uMMA test.
 
 Of 23 vegetarians identified with high uMMA, 83% (19/23) had normal serum B12 
  levels.5
 
 Asymptomatic patients and healthy volunteers with normal B12 levels but elevated 
  MMA have been reported. 1,2,5,14,27-32
 
 Five geriatric patients with normal serum B12 levels and suspected Alzheimer's 
  dementia, were reported successfully reversed with intramuscular B12. The lower 
  limit of vitamin B12 in Japan and some European countries is 500 pg/mL, which 
  is based on neurological criteria.32
 |  |  Serum MMA test
| Falsely positive serum MMA tests 
| Norman and Cronin documented reports of the SMMA assay yielding falsely positive 
  results in conditions of renal insufficiency, thyroid disease, pregnancy, small 
  bowel bacterial overgrowth, hemoconcentration, and for unexplained reasons.33 
 Renal insufficiency was associate with 25.5% of all abnormal SMMA levels in 
  one survey of 725 individuals over age 60. Carmel et. al2 recommend renal insufficiency must be considered in evaluation high SMMA levels.
 
 A study concludes that plasma creatinine must be included when assessing SMMA 
  levels, even within the normal range.34
 |  |  
| Falsely negative serum MMA tests 
| The serum MMA test was found less sensitive than the urinary MMA assay. In a 
  study of suspected B12 deficient vegetarians, the SMMA test (normal = 73-271 
  nm/L) identified 5 of 8 (63%) whereas the uMMA (normal < 4.0) assay detected 
  7 of 8 (88%). uMMA levels normalized with B12 therapy but not all SMMA levels. 
  Serum B12 levels supported the uMMA test as being valid .20 Although the numbers 
  are small, this article indicates that if large numbers of individuals are tested, 
  many individuals with neurologic manifestations may be missed without using 
  the uMMA assay. |  |  Serum Homocysteine
| Published data show that serum Hcys levels are rarely, if ever, needed in addition 
  to MMA levels to diagnose B12 deficiency. Reevaluating published data that listed 
  both SMMA and Hcys using the current normal value for SMMA, of 37 B12 deficient 
  patients, all were identified with high SMMA levels.22 Of 78 patients reported 
  B12 deficient using SMMA and Hcys, 77 were identified by high SMMA The remaining 
  patient with high serum Hcys was folate deficient, which could account for the 
  high Hcys level.35 
 In an uMMA screening study, serum Hcys levels were above normal in only 9 of 
  16 subjects (14). SMMA rose in gastrectomized rats within two months after surgery 
  whereas Hcys did not become elevated until ten months after surgery 36 and rats 
  feed a B12 deficient diet showed elevated SMMA after 3 months but normal Hcys 
  after 7 months.37 In nine vegetarians with high uMMA and /or low serum B12 levels, 
  all had normal Hcys levels (Normal = 5.1-13.9 mol/L).20 Serum Hcys levels are 
  also elevated by folate deficiency as well as numerous other conditions.6
 | 
Schilling Test
| Falsely normal 
| The Schilling test can be falsely normal in individuals who are unable to absorb 
  food-bound vitamin B12 but can absorb crystalline B12.38 
 
 |  |  uMMA Test 
| Falsely positive 
| In a double blinded prospective clinical evaluation of the uMMA test, the assay 
  was reported to have a specificity of 99%.17 However, the one patient reported 
  to have falsely high uMMA of 9.5 (normal <5.0) did not have a follow up uMMA 
  test after B12 therapy and therefore was most likely tissue deficient without 
  overt clinical evidence. 
 Of 16 subjects with elevated uMMA, all had normal MMA after B12 IM. (p<.001).14
 
 Of 7 subjects with high uMMA all normalized with B12 therapy.20 Other studies 
  noting high uMMA 5,9-11,39,40 demonstrate reductions of MMA with effective therapy 
  and no problem with falsely high uMMA.
 |  |  
| Falsely negative 
| The uMMA test identified non-anemic elderly individuals 14 and asymptomatic 
  vegetarians 5 as B12 deficient. uMMA normalized with adequate B12 therapy. Normal 
  serum B12 was found in 49% of the non-anemic elderly (normal uMMA < 5.0) and 
  83% of the vegetarian population. (normal uMMA < 4.0). These individual may 
  have been missed using the conventional serum B12 assay. These data demonstrate 
  that there is no problem with falsely negative uMMA and there is no study to 
  date reporting falsely negative uMMA. |  |  
 CONCLUSION
| The Mayo Clinic Proceedings spotlighted the uMMA test as preferred because of 
  convenience and sensitivity.41 
 In recent comparative studies, the uMMA test was found more sensitive than the 
  serum B12 assay5 or the SMMA test.20
 
 A study found that patients with neurologic disturbances excreted larger amounts 
  of uMMA than those without neurologic disorders42 and recommend the uMMA assay 
  use to attenuate an important cause of permanent neurologic disability.43
 
 
 
| 
| The uMMA test reflects tissue/cellular vitamin B12 deficiency and is the leading 
  candidate as the "gold standard" assay for identifying tissue B12 
  deficiency.19,21 |  |  |  
 
 
For test kit requests or more information E-Mail NCL or
 Call toll free at 1-800-397-7408"Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the Lord of hosts"
 |